Learn
A little clarity for your next decision.
Loading your learning library…
Investor WorkspaceWelcome, there!Log Out
Investor WorkspaceA little clarity for your next decision.
By Jerry Baker
Like-kind property means property with the same nature or character, even when its condition, quality, or use differs. In a current 1031 exchange, eligible business or investment real estate in the United States can generally be replaced with another type of eligible real estate in the United States. You still must review how both properties are held, the interest you own, and the rules for completing the exchange.
If you sell an apartment building, you do not have to buy another apartment building. A rental house, warehouse, retail property, or investment land may be like-kind if it meets the rules. The tax concept is much broader than matching the label on a property listing. [1] [2]
The IRS looks at the nature or character of the property. Grade and quality do not have to match. Improved and unimproved real estate can be like-kind. A dated property and a new building can be like-kind. A city property and a farm can be like-kind.
That flexibility can open useful choices. You may want a different location, less management work, or a different mix of tenants. A tax rule may allow a change. We still need to decide whether the change is sensible. A vacant parcel and an occupied rental building may meet the like-kind test. They can still serve very different needs.
I would first determine which options can fit the exchange. Then I would compare their income, risks, debt, costs, and exit plans. The word “qualifying” belongs at the start of that discussion. It does not finish the investment review.
It helps to ask three questions in order. They are related, but an answer to one does not settle the others. IRS guidance makes clear that both properties must meet the rules. That includes the property sold and the one acquired. [2]
After those property questions, review the transaction. A property can be an eligible kind of real estate and still be acquired through a failed exchange. The buildings may pass the test while the exchange fails. Late identification, receipt of sale proceeds, or an ownership problem can matter.
Keep the property review and the closing plan in the same conversation. You might find a good building but discover another problem. The buyer, interest, or funding path may not fit the exchange.
The examples below assume the required investment or business use and a properly completed exchange. They illustrate the property-type question only. They are not findings that any particular transaction qualifies.
| Property given up | Possible replacement | What still needs review |
|---|---|---|
| Rental house | Apartment building | Investment use, ownership, funding, and deadlines. |
| Commercial building | Unimproved investment land | Intent to hold the land and its carrying costs. |
| Investment land | Warehouse held for rent | Lease, tenant, property condition, and financing. |
| Farm real estate | Rental retail property | Separate farm equipment and other non-real-property assets. |
| Directly owned rental real estate | Interest in a properly structured DST | The trust's actual tax structure and the investor's exchange. |
| U.S. investment real estate | Real estate outside the United States | These locations are not like-kind under the standard Section 1031 rule. |
The first four comparisons follow the IRS's broad real-estate rule. The DST comparison relies on a separate look-through analysis described later. The location rule is a limit, even if the two buildings look the same and are used in the same way. [2] [6]
The regulations define real property for Section 1031. It includes land and improvements to land. Certain rights in real estate also count, as do some natural products that have not been removed. Permanently attached buildings and qualifying structural components fall within the definition. [3]
For a familiar building, the answer may be fairly direct. With a hotel, factory, farm, or other operating property, a sale may include several kinds of assets. The land and building need their own review. Machines, vehicles, customer contracts, and furniture sold with them can have different treatment.
A separate asset may require its own review. The rules ask how it is attached and whether it is designed to move. They also examine the damage removal would cause, plus the time and cost of moving it. State and local real-property law can also matter, subject to the federal exclusions.
Avoid blanket rules such as “everything bolted down qualifies.” The actual facts and regulatory tests control. Give the adviser an asset list with enough detail to understand each item. The contract's total price alone does not provide that detail.
The Section 1031 definition also does not decide an asset's depreciation treatment. The rules expressly keep those questions separate. An item can be real property for this purpose. It may still be subject to Section 1245 depreciation and gain rules. A cost-segregation label alone does not settle exchange eligibility or recapture.
Both sides of the exchange must be held for investment or productive use in a trade or business. You may move from business-use real estate to investment real estate, or the reverse. The uses do not have to be identical. [4]
A rental property is a common example of investment use. So is land held for future appreciation, even if it currently produces no rent. The regulation recognizes that unproductive real estate can be held for investment. Lack of current income does not, by itself, turn it into a personal asset.
Property held primarily for sale is excluded. A business might buy or build properties mainly to sell them to customers. Its facts differ from those of a long-term rental owner. Calling a property an “investment” in a spreadsheet does not override how it was acquired, used, and marketed.
Useful records may include leases, rent payments, business records, tax returns, listing history, and notes about the intended use. They help the adviser understand the facts. They are evidence to evaluate, not a kit that makes an otherwise ineligible transaction qualify.
Do not assume a universal one-year or two-year holding rule answers every case. The general use test differs from a specific safe harbor or related-party rule. A purchase, change of use, or resale may occur close to the exchange. Discuss that timing early with your tax adviser.
Your personal residence does not qualify merely because it rose in value. Hoping that a home will rise in value is one thing. Actually holding it for investment or business use is another. A second home used only for your own vacations has the same basic issue. [5]
A property may have both rental and personal use. A building may also have a business area and a separate residence. Those facts need allocation and tax review. Do not assume one eligible portion automatically makes the entire sale or purchase eligible.
Some dwellings are rented but also used personally at times. Revenue Procedure 2008-16 offers a safe harbor for certain cases. It addresses whether the dwelling is held for a qualifying purpose. It does not waive the rest of the exchange rules.
For the property being sold, the safe harbor requires ownership for at least the 24 months immediately before the exchange. In each of the two 12-month periods, it must be rented at a fair rental for at least 14 days. Personal use cannot exceed the greater of 14 days or 10% of the days rented at a fair rental.
For a replacement dwelling, the comparable ownership and use requirements apply during the 24 months immediately after the exchange. The procedure defines the relevant 12-month periods and personal-use rules. A casual calendar-year summary may not match those periods.
Suppose a home has 180 fair-rental days in one required 12-month period. Under that part of the test, personal use is limited to 18 days. With 100 fair-rental days, the limit would be 14 days. All other conditions still matter. These figures do not authorize unlimited family use or prove a particular rental rate is fair.
If a dwelling falls outside the safe harbor, do not invent a favorable answer or assume a result from one number. Ask for a full analysis of the actual use. If plans change after an exchange, tell your adviser promptly. The procedure addresses cases where the expected use of the new property is not met.
Qualifying real property in one U.S. state can generally be like-kind to qualifying real property in another. You do not have to stay in the same city, region, or state to meet the federal nature-or-character test.
The Section 1031 location rule treats U.S. and foreign real property as not like-kind. An apartment abroad is not a qualifying replacement for a U.S. apartment simply because both are rentals. Ownership in the same currency or through the same adviser does not change where the property is located. [2]
Cross-state planning still needs a state tax review. The federal property test is not a conclusion about state reporting, withholding, transfer taxes, or a later taxable sale. Tell your CPA where you live, where the old property is, and where each proposed replacement is located.
Location also changes the investment itself. Insurance costs, rental rules, maintenance needs, taxes, and demand can differ. The ability to buy in another state gives you choices; it does not make an unfamiliar market safe or remove the need to understand it.
Owning real estate is not always the same as owning an interest in an entity that owns real estate. Ordinary corporate shares, notes, and partnership interests generally do not qualify as replacement real property. There are specific rules and limited exceptions. The legal and tax classification matters. [3]
A REIT may own hundreds of buildings, but its ordinary shares do not become direct replacement real estate for your 1031 exchange. Likewise, a loan secured by a building is a debt investment. The presence of real estate behind it does not turn the note into ownership of that property.
A company selling a building and an owner selling their interest in that company are different transactions. Start with the actual asset being transferred and the taxpayer making the exchange. The planned purchase may change the taxpayer or the type of interest. Check that before closing.
Co-ownership can involve direct real-property ownership. A tenancy-in-common interest is one example. The arrangement still needs review. Its label does not prevent partnership treatment for tax purposes. The documents, rights, and activities matter.
The useful question is: “For federal tax purposes, what will I own after this purchase?” Follow that with: “Who is treated as the owner before and after the exchange?” Clear answers are more useful than a marketing phrase such as fractional real estate.
IRS Revenue Ruling 2004-86 describes a Delaware statutory trust with specific terms and limits. Under those facts, the DST is treated as an investment trust. The investors are treated as owners of interests in the underlying real estate. The ruling allows the described interests to be received in a qualifying exchange. [6]
The result comes from that tax treatment, not from the words “Delaware” or “trust.” A different trust with different powers may have a different result. Do not extend the ruling to every fund, business trust, or beneficial interest.
This structure can let you sell a property you manage yourself. You can replace it with a real estate interest managed through the DST arrangement. Management responsibility, control, fees, liquidity, and risk will differ from owning a rental yourself. Like-kind tax treatment does not mean the two ownership experiences are alike.
Review the current offering documents and the tax analysis for the specific structure. Confirm the interest, allocation, ownership, timing, and debt figures with the people handling your exchange. A general article cannot establish that your purchase will qualify.
Some real-property rights do not involve full ownership of the land. The rules recognize leaseholds, easements, and land development rights. That does not mean every possible pair of real-property rights is like-kind. Classification as real property is one step; comparing the interests is another. [3]
IRS Publication 544 gives the example of exchanging owned real estate for a real estate lease with 30 years or more to run. It also warns that not all exchanges of interests qualify. Do not treat a five-year occupancy lease as equivalent to full ownership based on the word “leasehold.” [2]
Unusual rights deserve a written review of their terms, duration, transferability, and state-law treatment. Mineral interests, limited life interests, and rights separated from a parcel should not be approved from a short description. Ask the adviser to identify the precise right and the authority for comparing it with the proposed replacement.
There is also a difference between a right to use real estate and a license to operate a business there. The regulations distinguish them. A business permit does not become qualifying real estate simply because the business occupies a building.
Consider a purchase that includes a building and movable furniture. Agreeing to one total price does not make the furniture real property. The transaction needs a supported allocation and review of any non-like-kind property received. [2]
There is a narrow incidental-property rule for identification. The items must typically be sold with the larger asset. Their total fair market value also must not exceed 15% of that asset's value. If both tests are met, they can be identified with the larger asset. This is not an exemption that makes the personal property tax-deferred.
Suppose a building is worth $2 million and qualifying incidental items for this identification rule are worth $100,000. The items equal 5% of the building value. That math may help with identification. It does not turn the items into like-kind real estate or remove the need to calculate gain.
Your adviser needs to distinguish what is being identified from what is being taxed. Depreciation recapture can require a separate analysis, too. Avoid using one helpful rule to answer three different questions.
An exchange can involve qualifying like-kind real estate and still produce taxable gain. Cash kept, other property received, and net debt relief can affect the result. Buying an eligible property is not enough by itself to defer every dollar of gain. [2]
For a simple land example, assume a $1 million property has a $400,000 adjusted basis. There is no debt, no expense, and no recapture. A fully qualifying exchange for $1 million of investment land can defer the $600,000 gain. The replacement basis generally remains $400,000.
If the investor instead receives $900,000 of qualifying land and keeps $100,000 cash, the land is still like-kind. Under these assumptions, $100,000 of gain is recognized. The other $500,000 remains deferred. The classification of the land has not changed; what the investor received has.
Actual calculations must account for debt, allowable expenses, basis adjustments, and any recapture rules. Tax deferral generally carries gain into the replacement investment through its basis. It does not simply give every replacement a new basis equal to its price.
A standard deferred exchange generally requires identification within 45 days after transferring the old property. The replacement must be received by the earlier of day 180 or the tax return due date, including extensions, for the transfer year. These periods run from the transfer; they are not added together. [2]
The written notice must follow the rules, including who may receive it. Multiple properties bring counting and value limits. Work with the qualified intermediary before the sale closes and leave time to resolve descriptions, signatures, and delivery.
Actual or constructive receipt of proceeds can change the result. Buying a similar building later does not turn a completed cash sale into an exchange after the fact. The funding and document arrangements need to be in place when required.
For construction, a related party, or an ownership change, ask for specific advice before committing. Those issues bring rules beyond the basic property comparison. A deadline should prompt earlier planning, not a rushed assumption that anything connected with real estate will work.
No. Qualifying investment or business real estate can generally be exchanged across property types. An apartment, retail building, warehouse, or investment land may qualify. Review use, ownership, location, and the exchange process separately. The same property type is neither a universal requirement nor a guarantee of success.
Yes, land held for investment can qualify even without current income. That is different from land held primarily for sale or used for personal purposes. Review the actual facts and intended use. You also need to consider carrying costs and how the lack of income fits your needs.
A personal residence does not qualify simply because it may appreciate. A dwelling with real rental use may require a more detailed review, including the dwelling safe harbor where applicable. Brief rentals or an arbitrary waiting period are not a cure for a plan that was personal from the start.
Generally yes, if the U.S. properties meet the other requirements. The federal like-kind test does not require the same state. State reporting and tax issues still need review. U.S. and foreign real property are not like-kind under the standard Section 1031 location rule.
No. The relevant IRS ruling describes a particular tax structure with limits on trust powers. Its look-through result is not blanket approval of every DST. Review the actual offering and your transaction. A qualifying structure also does not establish investment quality or fit.
No. The identification rule can let certain incidental items be identified with the larger property. It does not make those items like-kind real estate. Their value and tax treatment still need review, including any gain or recapture associated with the transaction.
No. It is a tax classification, not a promise about income, value, debt, or the exit. Compare the property and ownership terms on their own merits. A deal can meet an exchange requirement while creating risks or tradeoffs that do not fit your situation.
Educational information, not an offer or a personal tax, legal, or investment recommendation. Examples are hypothetical and omit stated adjustments. Tax treatment depends on your facts and current law. Review your transaction with your CPA, attorney, and qualified intermediary. Real estate investments can lose value and may be illiquid.
Enter your approved email to explore investments, save your shortlist, and keep learning.