Learn
A little clarity for your next decision.
Loading your learning library…
Investor WorkspaceWelcome, there!Log Out
Investor WorkspaceA little clarity for your next decision.
By Jerry Baker
Real estate agents can help clients understand where private and non-traded REITs fit among broad investment choices, while leaving securities recommendations and sales to properly authorized professionals. A real estate license alone does not authorize securities brokerage. A useful conversation begins with the client's next chapter, identifies tax and cash needs, and creates a clear handoff without promising returns or a quick exit.
A client can be finished with tenants without being finished with real estate. That does not automatically make a REIT the right choice. It does mean the conversation can continue beyond the next property listing.
I would first ask what the client wants to change. Is it the repair calls, a large loan, one difficult tenant, or the time spent managing? Each answer points to a different concern. Some owners may need a better manager. Others may want to sell, keep cash, or study a broader investment plan.
The agent's knowledge of the current property can be very useful. You may know its sale prospects, repair needs, and lease history better than the rest of the team. Bring those facts into the discussion without turning them into a recommendation for a security.
The goal is an informed choice after the sale, not a new product to push before the old property closes. Sometimes the most useful next step is a meeting with the CPA and financial professional before the client decides whether to list.
A REIT is a company that owns real estate or related assets. Buying its shares gives the client an interest in the company, not a deed to a selected apartment or warehouse. The company makes the operating and financing decisions within its governing terms. [1]
That difference matters to a longtime owner. The client may be used to choosing a roofer, approving a lease, and deciding when to sell. A share investment shifts those choices to a management team.
A useful question is whether the client wants less work, less control, or both. Those are not the same wish. A person who wants fewer repair calls may still care deeply about approving major decisions.
Explain the broad category in plain language, then stop before selecting an issuer or allocation. The client can explore the actual investment with a properly authorized professional who knows their full financial situation.
Exchange-listed, public non-traded, and private REITs are different categories. Public non-traded REITs are registered but do not trade on a national stock exchange. Private offerings rely on an exemption from registration. Public registration does not itself create an active trading market. [10]
Do not call every unlisted REIT private, or every public REIT liquid. The client needs the issuer's actual structure, disclosure documents, and exit terms. A name used casually in conversation may conceal a significant difference.
For an agent, the practical takeaway is to ask for the correct product name and leave room for comparison. An investor considering an unlisted product should understand that listed alternatives exist. The best route cannot be chosen from the word “passive.”
Also avoid assuming a broad portfolio. A company can focus on one sector, region, or strategy. Fewer management chores for the shareholder do not necessarily mean fewer investment risks.
The SEC says there is no general broker-dealer registration exception for licensed real estate agents who conduct securities brokerage. It looks at actual activities, including soliciting, negotiating, handling funds, and transaction-related compensation. Calling someone a finder or consultant does not settle the issue. [2]
This guide assumes an agent who is not separately authorized for securities work. A person with additional registrations must still act within the relevant firm's supervision and approved role. A real estate credential by itself does not supply that authority.
I would set the boundary before the first introduction. Decide who can explain specific investments, collect financial records, discuss allocations, and process an application. The agent should not become the unofficial salesperson because they happen to have the longest relationship with the client.
When a question moves beyond your role, say so plainly. It is better to send a precise question to the right person than to guess and later try to repair the client's expectation.
FINRA Rule 2040 restricts payments to unregistered persons when the payments and related activities require broker-dealer registration. It also requires firms to have reasonable support for their determination. A casual agreement between two professionals does not answer the legal question. [3]
Before discussing compensation, let the firms' compliance teams and counsel review the proposed work, payment, state rules, and registrations. Do not assume changing “commission” to “marketing fee” changes the underlying facts.
This is also a client-trust issue. A client should not discover later that an introduction had a financial incentive nobody explained. Any permitted arrangement needs the disclosures and controls required for its actual structure.
An unpaid introduction is not an unlimited safe harbor either. The activities still matter. Avoid negotiating terms, collecting orders, or steering the client toward a particular security under the label of a friendly referral.
Keep the questions focused on the property transaction and the client's stated needs. You do not need to collect a full securities application to make a useful introduction.
Those answers help the receiving team begin in the right place. They do not establish that a private REIT fits. Leave the eligibility, recommendation, and subscription work with the appropriate professionals.
Write down uncertain answers as uncertain. If the client says, “I think my basis is about half the sale price,” relay that as an estimate for the CPA to check, not an established tax figure.
Property sale proceeds after a loan payoff are not the same as taxable gain. Gain generally depends on amount realized and adjusted basis, while the payoff affects the cash available. The CPA should calculate the actual tax result. [4]
Here is a hypothetical handoff example. A property sells for $1,200,000 with $60,000 of selling costs, a $400,000 loan payoff, and $450,000 of adjusted basis. Ignore all other adjustments.
Cash before income tax is $740,000: sale price minus costs and debt. Gain is $690,000: sale price minus costs and basis. Neither figure is the tax bill. Tax rates, depreciation, losses, and other circumstances still need review.
If the CPA tentatively sets a $180,000 tax reserve, the remaining cash would be $560,000 under that assumption. Passing along $740,000 as fully available to invest could create a serious household cash problem. Keep the reserve estimate and its source visible.
Ordinary REIT shares do not qualify as replacement real property under Section 1031. The rule applies regardless of whether the shares are listed, public non-traded, or privately offered. Buying shares after a taxable sale does not retroactively create a qualifying exchange. [5]
If the client wants an exchange, bring the qualified intermediary and tax advisers into the process before the sale closes. The exchange timeline and control of proceeds need their own review. An investment discussion is not a substitute for setting up the exchange.
A qualifying DST interest may have different tax treatment, but not every trust qualifies merely because DST appears in its name. Section 721 partnership contributions are another distinct route, and direct qualifying contributions need not always begin with a DST. [6] [7]
The agent's useful contribution is identifying the question early. Avoid telling the client they can simply “exchange into a REIT” and leaving someone else to explain why the proposed purchase does not work.
Many private offerings limit participation to accredited investors. The applicable exemption and offering documents control. Rule 506(b) can allow a limited number of qualifying non-accredited purchasers, while Rule 506(c) requires accredited purchasers and reasonable verification steps. [8]
Do not assume a client qualifies because the property sale was large or because you have known the family for years. Accredited status can depend on facts beyond the size of this transaction.
The SEC distinguishes the reasonable-belief standard under 506(b) from verification under 506(c). It also warns that checking a box alone, without other knowledge, is insufficient for either standard. Let the issuer and authorized team manage the applicable process. [9]
Eligibility is only an entry condition. A client can meet it and still be unable to tolerate the risk or lack of liquidity. Do not treat accredited status as an endorsement of the investment or as proof the client can afford a loss.
A property seller may have several uses for the same proceeds. Taxes, a new home, family support, and investment income can compete for those dollars. The handoff should identify those uses before an allocation is discussed.
Suppose the client has $560,000 after the assumed tax reserve. They expect to use $150,000 for a home purchase and want $60,000 for emergencies. That leaves $350,000 before considering any other needs.
This is a budget exercise, not a recommendation to invest $350,000 in a REIT. The financial professional still needs to evaluate the client's full holdings and goals. The point is to avoid treating every dollar in the closing account as long-term investment money.
If a purchase is expected in six months, do not assume a repurchase plan will supply the needed cash on that date. The client's timeline and the investment's exit terms must be considered together.
Unlisted REITs may have limited repurchase programs, but terms vary and requests may be restricted or suspended. A stated net asset value is not a guarantee that all shares can be sold for that amount on demand. [1]
Ask the investment professional to explain the process in an ordinary sentence: when can a request be made, how much might be accepted, how is the price set, and what could delay payment?
For a hypothetical example, a client requests $100,000 and only $25,000 is accepted. The remaining $75,000 is still invested. It is not cash for the next down payment merely because a request was submitted.
Do not invent a universal waiting period. Some programs differ by holding period, share class, or type of request. The current written policy and its limits matter more than a general promise that there is a quarterly window.
Clients often begin with the monthly check they want. That is a useful need to communicate, but it is not a reason to promise a distribution amount.
For planning only, a hypothetical 5% annual cash payment on $300,000 is $15,000 a year, or $1,250 a month before tax. A 20% reduction would lower those figures to $12,000 and $1,000. Neither percentage is a current offering quote.
The household would need to cover a $250 monthly gap in the reduced case. Ask the authorized professional how the actual investment earns cash, pays expenses, and handles a weaker year. A tax benefit does not guarantee the payment.
Also separate cash yield from total return. A payment can arrive while the value of the shares falls. The client should hear both parts of the investment result rather than only the number that sounds like rent.
An agent can contribute local facts without approving an entire portfolio. You might explain a neighborhood's leasing pattern or identify an expense omitted from a seller's budget. Keep the scope clear.
For example, knowledge of one warehouse does not establish the quality of a REIT's debt, fee structure, or management agreement. A strong tenant in one building does not prove that every asset in the portfolio is similar.
I would separate observations from conclusions. “This lease expires next year” is a fact to verify. “The fund is safe because the tenant is well known” is a much broader claim and does not follow from that fact alone.
If the investment team requests local market information, include its date and limits. A recent lease comp may help underwriting, but it is not a promise that a different building will achieve the same rent.
Ask the client before sharing their name, contact details, or transaction information. Send only what the receiving team needs for the first conversation. The client can provide sensitive records through that firm's secure process.
A useful introduction might say: “My client is considering a sale and wants to understand ways to keep real estate exposure with less management work. No investment has been selected. Please discuss the options with the client and their CPA.”
Add the expected closing date if the client agrees, along with any unresolved exchange question. Avoid attaching a claim that the client is accredited, that a particular yield meets their needs, or that tax deferral has already been confirmed.
Ask the receiving professional to explain their role, firm, and services directly. The client should know who will advise them, who will process the transaction, and how each person is paid. A warm introduction should not obscure those relationships.
The first call works better with a short agenda. Start with the property and sale timeline, then the client's cash needs, tax questions, and desire for future involvement. Discuss specific offerings only within the authorized professional's role.
Keep the client's existing advisers involved when the client wants them there. A CPA may spot a basis issue while the financial professional sees that too much wealth would remain tied to real estate.
Before ending the call, identify the next action and the person responsible. The agent may provide the draft closing statement. The CPA may estimate taxes. The investment team may collect information through its own approved process.
Do not turn the call into a deadline to decide. If the client needs more time, record that. A relationship should not depend on the client buying a security or keeping the entire sale proceeds with one provider.
Sometimes the client asks for an answer no one can give yet. Perhaps final tax numbers are missing, the sale date is unsettled, or the investment's current documents are still under review.
Use a short open-items list. Write the question, why it matters, who will answer it, and when the team will check back. That is more helpful than a confident estimate repeated until everyone forgets it was only an estimate.
For example, “We need $400,000 of income-producing investments” may turn out to mean “We need $20,000 of annual cash after tax.” Those are different starting points. The professional should clarify the need rather than fit the client to a preset amount.
The client may ultimately choose direct ownership, a listed investment, another kind of asset, or no new investment for now. A sound handoff should leave those choices open.
After the introduction, ask whether the client received the information they needed. Do not ask what it would take to get them to subscribe or pressure them to increase the amount.
If the client sends a technical question, route it to the person responsible and keep the answer in context. Summarizing a long answer as “the accountant said it is tax-free” can erase the conditions that made the answer accurate.
My preference is a team where each person stays useful in their own role. The agent can continue supporting the property sale and future real estate needs. The securities and tax professionals handle their respective decisions.
That approach respects the relationship the agent has built. It also gives the client a clearer view of the choices ahead, including the reasons a particular investment may not belong in their plan.
Keep a brief note of the introduction and the client's permission. Record the date, people involved, and the purpose of the call. This does not need to become a second investment file held by the agent. It should show that the client asked to explore options and that specific advice was left to the right team. If the client later asks you to forward more records, confirm the destination and the scope again. Clear records help prevent a simple introduction from being remembered as an investment promise that nobody meant to make.
A real estate license alone does not authorize securities brokerage. Separate registrations, firm supervision, and applicable law determine whether a person may perform that work.
No. Public non-traded REITs are registered but unlisted. Private offerings use registration exemptions. Read the exact issuer and offering documents.
Ordinary REIT shares do not qualify. Raise the exchange question with the intermediary and tax team before closing rather than treating a share purchase as a replacement-property plan.
No. Eligibility depends on the applicable rules and the investor's facts. The issuer and authorized team should handle the required assessment.
No. Compensation and activities need legal and firm review. A real estate commission arrangement does not establish permission for securities-related payments.
With the client's permission, provide the sale stage, expected timeline, stated goals, key cash needs, and the advisers already involved. Label estimates and unresolved questions clearly.
Educational information, not an offer or a personal tax, legal, or investment recommendation. Examples are hypothetical and omit stated adjustments. Tax treatment depends on your facts and current law. Review your transaction with your CPA, attorney, and qualified intermediary. Real estate investments can lose value and may be illiquid.
Enter your approved email to explore investments, save your shortlist, and keep learning.