Learn
A little clarity for your next decision.
Loading your learning library…
Investor WorkspaceWelcome, there!Log Out
Investor WorkspaceA little clarity for your next decision.
By Jerry Baker
Choose a 1031 exchange company by checking the service you need, the people responsible, the agreement, and how your money will be handled. A qualified intermediary, an investment brokerage, and a tax adviser perform different jobs, even when their websites use similar language. This guide provides questions for comparing providers before the sale closes.
The phrase “1031 exchange company” can refer to more than one business. A qualified intermediary, or QI, helps carry out an exchange under an agreement. An investment firm may offer replacement investment choices. A CPA or attorney may advise on tax or legal issues. One service does not automatically include the others.
Start with a written description of the assignment. Are you hiring someone to handle exchange documents and funds, to evaluate replacement investments, or to give a tax opinion? If you need all three, identify who provides each service and under what agreement.
The deferred-exchange regulation sets conditions for the QI safe harbor, including the agreement and restrictions on access to funds. It also addresses disqualified persons. The word “qualified” in a company's name is not proof that those conditions fit your transaction. [1]
Ask the provider to explain its role in plain language. A clear answer should include what it does not do. You should not discover after closing that the company assumed someone else was checking the ownership, replacement eligibility, or identification notice.
Find out which legal entity will sign the agreement and which entity will hold or control funds. A familiar brand may have several affiliates. Ask whether a parent company has any legal obligation to support the entity you are hiring, rather than assuming the names are interchangeable.
Request the primary contact, backup contact, and escalation route. A transaction should not depend on one person's availability. Ask who can answer a time-sensitive question when the usual contact is on vacation or helping another client.
If the service includes securities recommendations, check the firm and individual through the relevant registration sources. FINRA recommends checking registration and asking about services, experience, compensation, and disciplinary history. Those checks are part of reviewing an investment professional, not a substitute for evaluating a QI's fund arrangements. [2]
Use records from the appropriate regulator or official source where available. A badge on a website, membership in an association, or a positive testimonial may provide context, but none should be treated as a government guarantee of performance or safety.
A provider may have handled many exchanges but little work resembling yours. Explain the property type, ownership, expected timing, number of replacements, and any unusual facts. Ask whether the team has the capacity and relevant experience to handle that assignment now.
A straightforward deferred exchange differs from a reverse exchange, an improvement exchange, or a transaction involving related parties. A business that can handle one should not be assumed to handle every structure. Ask who supplies specialized legal or tax analysis when needed.
Use a scenario rather than a broad question. “How would you coordinate three replacement closings in two states?” is more revealing than “Are you experienced?” The answer should explain the steps, responsible people, and documents without promising a result before the facts are reviewed.
Ask for references or other evidence the provider can appropriately share. Respect client privacy. What you want to learn is how the firm communicates, handles changes, and resolves problems, not the names or financial details of unrelated investors.
Request the proposed agreement early enough for your attorney and CPA to review the parts relevant to them. Do not make the first substantive review while a closing team is waiting for signatures. The agreement is where the service, limits, fees, and responsibilities should become concrete.
Ask how sale and purchase contracts are handled, how notices are delivered, and what you must provide. Confirm which deadlines the company tracks and which decisions remain yours. A provider's calendar reminder does not relieve you of the need to understand the transaction.
Review provisions addressing disputes, liability limits, governing law, access to records, termination, and the release of funds. Ask counsel what those provisions mean in a problem scenario. A clause that seems unimportant in a successful exchange may matter greatly if something goes wrong.
The regulation restricts when exchange funds can be made available under the safe harbor. Do not assume you can withdraw the money whenever a replacement search becomes frustrating. Ask the QI and counsel to explain the release conditions before you sign. [1]
Ask for a plain-language funds map. Where does the money go when the relinquished property closes? At which bank or banks is it placed? Who is the account owner, who has authority to move funds, and what records identify your interest?
Ask whether client money is held separately from operating funds and whether accounts are individual or pooled. Then ask what the legal documents and bank records actually say. A reassuring label such as “segregated” should lead to a specific explanation, not end the discussion.
Find out whether the provider can invest, lend, pledge, or otherwise use exchange funds. Ask what restrictions apply and how compliance with them is monitored. The answer should be consistent across the agreement, written policy, and the person explaining the process.
Also ask how you receive balance and transaction information. You should know what evidence will show that funds arrived and later left for an authorized closing. Visibility into records is useful, but it should not be confused with unrestricted withdrawal rights.
FDIC insurance addresses covered deposits when an insured bank fails. The standard amount is $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, per ownership category. It does not insure every financial product or guarantee the conduct or solvency of a separate exchange company. [3]
Funds held through a third party may qualify for pass-through coverage only when the ownership, disclosure, and recordkeeping requirements are met. That treatment is not a separate ownership category. Your other deposits in the same category at the same bank can affect the total covered amount. [4]
Ask the provider to explain the proposed coverage for your actual amount and ownership. Supply information about other relevant deposits when the coverage review requires it. A general statement that a bank is insured does not establish that your entire exchange balance is insured.
For example, splitting money among several account numbers at one bank does not by itself create separate coverage. If a program uses several banks, ask for the participating bank details and the method for avoiding overlap. Obtain a written explanation rather than relying on a logo.
A company may describe fidelity coverage, errors-and-omissions insurance, a bond, or other protection. Ask for evidence of current coverage and enough detail for your advisers to understand it. The type, insured party, limits, exclusions, and claim conditions matter.
Ask whether a stated limit applies per claim, per client, or across the entire firm. Find out whether it could be shared with other claims. A large number on a brochure is not necessarily an amount available to you after a loss.
Do not combine unrelated protections into one claim that the exchange is “fully insured.” Bank deposit insurance, professional insurance, and contractual protections address different events. An agreement may also limit a provider's responsibility in ways that deserve legal review.
My preferred question is practical: “If this specific problem happened, which protection would apply, who would make the claim, and what would remain uncovered?” A precise answer is more valuable than a collection of reassuring words.
Learn how the provider authenticates instructions, approves transfers, and checks a last-minute change. Ask whether more than one person is involved in important payment steps and how the company handles a suspicious request. The procedure should be understandable before it is needed.
Establish trusted contact information ahead of closing. CFPB guidance recommends confirming payment instructions through known representatives and previously agreed phone numbers, rather than trusting a new email's contact details. That principle is useful when exchange funds are moving between parties. [5]
Ask what you should do if an email appears to come from the provider but changes the destination bank. The response should involve an independent check, not a reply to the same message. A familiar signature or copied transaction detail does not prove that instructions are genuine.
Confirm the institution's operating hours and required lead time. A legal deadline and a wire-processing cutoff are different. Build enough time to check instructions and resolve a discrepancy without making a rushed transfer.
Before hiring, ask a few questions that resemble the transaction you expect. How do you deliver an identification? How is receipt confirmed? Who answers if a replacement seller changes the closing date? What documents must arrive before funds can be released?
Notice whether the answer is direct and consistent. A provider does not need to know every fact immediately. It should be willing to say what requires review and tell you who will respond. Confidence without a clear process is less useful than an honest, organized answer.
Ask about response times without inventing a guarantee. Some questions can be answered quickly; others need counsel or bank review. The important point is that the provider explains the expected timing and tells you when the issue has moved to someone else.
Check the technology too. Can you access documents and messages in a usable way? Is there a secure method for sensitive records? If you are not comfortable with the portal, ask how the team will support you before a critical signature is due.
Request a written fee schedule for your planned transaction. Ask about the initial fee, extra replacement properties, multiple closings, wires, amendments, special structures, and cancellation. Find out whether the provider retains interest or other earnings on funds and how that arrangement is disclosed.
Use the same assumed transaction when comparing firms. A quote for one sale and one purchase is not directly comparable with a quote that includes three replacement closings. A low starting price can be misleading if important steps are outside the quoted scope.
Consider an original, hypothetical fee comparison. Firm A quotes $900 plus $250 for each replacement after the first. With three replacements, the stated total is $1,400. Firm B quotes $1,250 including three replacements. Other charges and service differences must still be checked.
The point is not to choose Firm B automatically. It is to compare like with like. A $150 difference should not distract from fund handling, legal terms, experience, and service. Ask for clarification of anything that cannot be calculated from the quote.
If the company offers replacement securities, ask about its registration, due diligence, available product range, compensation, and conflicts. Ask how it decides whether a particular investment fits your needs, rather than simply whether it qualifies for exchange treatment.
Private offerings can involve limited disclosure, substantial risk, and long restrictions on resale. The SEC also explains that filing Form D is not SEC approval. The investment firm's review should explain those risks and the source of projected payments. [6]
Ask whether the firm offers proprietary investments, whether all choices come from a narrow set of managers, and whether compensation differs among offerings. These questions do not prove that a conflict makes every recommendation wrong. They help you understand the incentives and limitations.
Keep the investment decision separate from choosing the QI. A well-run exchange process cannot make an unsuitable investment appropriate. A thoughtful investment recommendation cannot fix a defective exchange agreement or missed deadline.
Use a simple scorecard with categories for role, agreement, fund arrangements, coverage evidence, transaction experience, service, technology, and total cost. For each provider, write the actual answer and the document supporting it. Leave an unanswered question blank rather than giving it a favorable score.
Identify a few requirements that matter enough to stop the selection. For example, you may decide not to proceed without a clear explanation of where funds are held or a named escalation contact. A low fee should not compensate for a critical unanswered question.
Then compare the tradeoffs that remain. One provider may offer more personal support; another may have a system you find easier to use. The choice should reflect your transaction and needs, not a universal ranking that ignores differences among clients.
Keep the final scorecard with the agreement. It records why you selected the provider and which representations mattered. If a material arrangement changes before funding, revisit the choice instead of assuming the earlier review still describes the service.
Tell prospective providers the actual closing date immediately. Ask whether they can complete their review and required documents in time. Do not assume a rapid online sign-up means the transaction has been fully accepted or correctly structured.
Bring the settlement team, CPA, and attorney into the timing discussion. Send a short list of outstanding items and identify who must supply each one. Independent work can move at the same time, but a missing required agreement cannot be replaced by optimism.
The statutory periods generally begin with the relinquished-property transfer. The identification and completion limits do not provide extra time to fix every pre-closing mistake. The completion limit also includes the earlier tax-return-due-date rule. [7]
If the intended arrangement cannot be put in place properly, ask the advisers to explain the alternatives and consequences. Do not rely on a provider that promises to repair any problem after the proceeds have already been paid to you.
Imagine you have spoken with two providers. Both say they can handle the exchange. The first has sent a sample agreement, a funds map, and a fee schedule. The second has sent an attractive brochure and a lower price, but has not yet answered where the funds will be held.
That does not prove the second firm is unsafe. It means the review is incomplete. Ask for the missing answer and the document that supports it. Give the same request to each firm so you can compare the response fairly.
Now suppose the first agreement names an affiliate you have not reviewed. Add that fact to the question list too. A complete-looking packet can still contain an important gap. The right process tests the actual arrangement rather than rewarding whichever firm sent more pages.
Next, consider your own needs. You expect two purchases and may be traveling during one closing. Ask both teams how they would handle signatures, time zones, and a payment issue while you are away. Make sure the proposed solution works with your devices and access.
Finally, write a short decision note: what each firm confirmed, what your advisers reviewed, what remains open, and why you prefer one. If the most important questions remain unanswered, keep the decision open. You have learned something useful even if you have not chosen a provider yet.
This exercise avoids a common shortcut: confusing a polished sales call with a completed review. The best evidence is a clear, consistent answer tied to the agreement and the actual service you will receive.
Before signing, confirm the legal entity, services, fee schedule, fund arrangements, key contacts, and required next steps. Ask your advisers to resolve the legal and tax questions that remain. You should be able to explain the provider's job in a few plain sentences.
After engagement, retain confirmations and track the actual transaction. Choosing a provider is the start of an ongoing process, not the end of your involvement. Send changed facts promptly and ask for written answers to material questions.
No comparison can remove every risk. The aim is to make the important facts visible and choose a provider suited to the job. This guide is a selection framework, not an endorsement of a particular company or a legal opinion about its agreement.
No. A QI handles agreed exchange functions, while investment and tax professionals have different roles. Ask each provider to identify its actual services and the agreement covering them.
No. Coverage depends on the depositor, bank, ownership category, amount, and applicable requirements. Third-party arrangements also require review of pass-through conditions and other deposits at the same bank.
Compare the total fee for the same transaction, then weigh fund handling, agreement terms, experience, and service. Price is one factor and should not hide a critical unanswered question.
Recent-agent and other disqualification rules may apply, with specified exceptions. Have the actual relationship reviewed under the regulation rather than assuming familiarity makes the person eligible.
Do not assume so. The safe-harbor rules and agreement restrict access and define release conditions. Ask the QI and counsel to explain those conditions before signing.
Ask where the money is held, who controls it, what records identify your interest, and what prevents unauthorized use. Request documents supporting the answer rather than relying on a general assurance.
No. A Form D filing is not SEC approval. Review the investment's risks, terms, costs, and fit separately from the exchange process and the provider's registration.
Early enough to have the required agreements and steps in place before the sale closes. Starting during sale planning gives your advisers more time to resolve questions and compare alternatives.
Educational information, not an offer or a personal tax, legal, or investment recommendation. Examples are hypothetical and omit stated adjustments. Tax treatment depends on your facts and current law. Review your transaction with your CPA, attorney, and qualified intermediary. Real estate investments can lose value and may be illiquid.
Enter your approved email to explore investments, save your shortlist, and keep learning.