Learn
A little clarity for your next decision.
Loading your learning library…
Investor WorkspaceWelcome, there!Log Out
Investor WorkspaceA little clarity for your next decision.
By Jerry Baker
Secure Properties invests in net lease real estate and related transactions, and it launched a DST platform in 2026. The main review question is how the property, tenant, lease, and ownership structure work together. This guide explains the firm's approach and the evidence I would want before considering an investment.
This profile covers Secure Properties at secureproperties.com. Its public site describes property purchases, sale-leasebacks, development capital, and other real estate financing. Its investment platforms include joint ventures and DSTs. These are different ways to invest, with different rights and risks. The company name is not a promise that capital or income is secure. [1]
The current team page lists Brian Mansouri as managing principal and Kevin Ross as principal. I would use the team list as a starting point, then ask who is responsible for the specific property, financing, reporting, and investor decisions under review. A title alone does not explain that person's role in your investment. [2]
I would also separate real estate ownership from operating-business exposure. A company may provide capital to a business, own its building, or do both through different entities. Knowing that a transaction involved Secure does not tell us which of those interests a particular investor owns.
This profile does not establish a broker relationship with Baker 1031, current investment availability, or approval of any offering. It is a guide to the business model and the questions it raises.
In a January 28, 2026 company announcement, Secure introduced its DST platform through Secure Real Estate Exchange and described its first DST acquisition. Its website later announced that the first DST was fully subscribed. Those events should be dated and kept separate from the broader firm's transaction history. A completed equity raise is not a completed property investment. [3] [4]
I would ask for the experience the proposed program can actually draw on. Which team members have run comparable properties? Who has administered DST reporting and compliance? What systems track investor records, payments, and tax documents? Property experience matters, but so does operating the legal and service structure around the property.
A broad record may include different property types, joint ventures, or business financing. I would not put all of those results into one return figure without knowing the mix. Nor would I describe earlier transactions as DST results just because the sponsor now has a DST platform.
For a newer program, it is reasonable to have less program-specific history. The useful response is to make that limit clear and examine the people, contracts, and controls in more detail. A directory should not invent a long DST record to make a page feel complete.
Secure's partnering page describes sale-leasebacks, build-to-suit projects, and lease changes such as blending and extending terms. In a sale-leaseback, an operating business sells a property and becomes a tenant. I would review the reason for that transaction alongside the building and lease. [5]
The business receives cash at closing. What will it do with that cash? It might repay debt, buy another business, fund growth, or provide proceeds to its owners. Those uses can have very different effects on its ability to pay rent afterward.
I would want financial statements that show the business before and after the transaction. A business that owned its building now has a lease obligation. The model should include that rent and any new operating debt. An old earnings figure that excludes the new rent does not show the tenant's position after closing.
The purchase price and rent also need separate market tests. A high agreed rent may help justify a high sale price on paper. That does not prove another tenant would pay the same amount if the original business left. I would compare replacement rents and the cost of making the property useful to a new occupant.
A long lease can support a plan, but the tenant's ability to carry it is essential. The building and the business need separate reviews, then a review of how they depend on each other.
Consider a hypothetical business with $3 million available before rent and other excluded obligations. If annual rent is $1 million, that simple measure shows three times rent coverage. If that cash measure falls to $2 million, coverage becomes two times. The lease has not changed; the tenant's cushion has.
Now ask what the measure leaves out. Does the business still need to pay interest, replace equipment, fund working capital, or pay taxes from the same cash? Is the figure based on a full year, a short strong period, or a forecast? Does it include locations outside the leased property?
I would want the calculation defined rather than rely on a ratio alone. A useful report shows the exact earnings measure, the period, the costs excluded, and which entity must pay the lease. It should also explain any adjustments added back to earnings.
For a business buying other locations, I would examine the combined balance sheet. More stores can add revenue and also add debt, integration costs, and management work. The property investor needs to know whether the expansion improves the rent-paying entity's position or creates new demands on its cash.
These are review questions and invented arithmetic, not a statement about the finances of a Secure tenant.
A September 16, 2026 company announcement describes Secure buying early-education properties in a sale-leaseback tied to an operator's acquisition of locations. That example shows how a real estate closing can support a separate business transaction. It does not make the property's investor an owner of the school business or establish a guarantee from a national brand. [6]
For that property type, I would examine the lease and the operating approvals separately. Which entity holds the license? What happens to those approvals if the operator changes? Can a replacement business open quickly, or would it face a long review and buildout process? Local counsel and operating experts should answer the applicable rules.
The site itself matters: drop-off space, parking, outdoor areas, layout, and access. Those features may be central to one use but less helpful to another. A replacement tenant could value them, ignore them, or need them removed.
I would ask whether demand is measured by nearby families, actual enrollment, or a broader population statistic. A large number of households in a radius does not show whether a particular school is full or profitable. Enrollment trends, staffing costs, pricing, and competing locations should be reviewed where reliable information is available.
These questions do not assert a problem with Secure's properties. They explain why a familiar use and a long lease are not the end of the review.
Secure's DST launch announcement described an industrial acquisition. An industrial review should focus on how the building supports the tenant's work and how it could serve another user. The result should not depend entirely on the present tenant staying forever. [3]
I would examine loading, power, ceiling height, floor capacity, truck access, and office buildout. Does the property have costly features that only one business needs? Can the space be divided? Are there permits, site conditions, or shared access agreements that limit a new tenant?
Environmental review is part of that file. Prior and current uses may create different issues, and lease language does not remove the need for a proper report. I would ask who pays for required work, what insurance exists, and what happens if a responsible party cannot perform.
The exit forecast should use suitable comparable properties. A sale price based on a fully leased building differs from a value with vacancy and required improvements. I would want both views when the lease and intended sale dates are close.
Secure lists blend-and-extend arrangements among its partnering options. That term generally describes changes that combine an existing lease period with an extension. The exact trade depends on the contract. More years on the lease do not tell us whether the revised economics are better. [5]
Imagine a tenant agrees to stay longer in return for lower rent during the next two years. The owner might gain a longer income plan while giving up cash now. Whether that helps investors depends on the size of the reduction, the new term, future increases, tenant credit, and the value of other options.
I would compare the original and revised schedules month by month. What cash is lost early? What is gained later? Are there new concessions, improvement payments, or early-exit rights? Does the lender have to approve the change?
Then I would test the tenant's ability to stay through the extended term. A longer promise from a strained tenant is not the same as a stronger promise. The review should connect the lease change to the business's actual condition and the property's alternative uses.
Secure describes several investment platforms, including joint ventures, DSTs, and other arrangements. I would read the specific legal documents rather than assume that all programs have the same ownership, tax treatment, control, or property mix. A platform description is a menu of activities, not one standard contract. [7]
For a DST, IRS Revenue Ruling 2004-86 provides a fact-specific example of a trust interest treated as real property for federal tax purposes. The trust's powers and other facts matter. A business or partnership interest should not be treated as qualifying replacement real estate simply because the issuer also owns buildings. [8] [9]
I would ask who owns the property, who owes any loan, who signs the lease, and who can make decisions. If a master tenant sits between the trust and the operating tenant, I would examine that contract and the master tenant's finances too.
The number of properties also needs a direct answer. A sponsor with a broad portfolio can offer an interest tied to a single asset. Several locations may still depend on one operator. We should describe your actual concentration rather than borrow the sponsor's whole portfolio for the sales story.
A rent increase in the lease is not automatically an equal increase in cash paid to investors. Owner expenses, debt payments, fees, and reserves may change at the same time. I would trace the rent schedule through a complete cash-flow model.
For example, suppose annual rent is $1 million and rises 2%, adding $20,000. If expenses paid by the owner rise from $200,000 to $230,000, cash before debt and other costs falls from $800,000 to $790,000. The rent went up while the remaining cash went down.
This made-up example is not a Secure projection. It is a reminder to identify exactly which costs the tenant pays and which remain with the owner. A net lease label can hide important details unless the actual obligations are listed.
I would also compare fixed rent growth with a range of expense and inflation assumptions. If the lease grows slowly but costs rise quickly, the investor may feel the squeeze. If costs stay lower, results may look better. The model should show that range without calling either outcome certain.
The first step is a clear sources-and-uses schedule. Where does each dollar of investor money and debt go? How much buys real estate, funds reserves, pays selling costs, or compensates affiliates? If a related party owned the property first, what did it pay and what changed before the investor purchase?
I would distinguish the seller's property price from the investor's all-in cost. A cap rate based on the property price does not include every investor expense. The cash available after fees, financing, and reserves may look different from the property's net operating income.
For any loan, I would review maturity, interest changes, principal payments, prepayment costs, and required coverage. A long tenant lease does not make a shorter loan maturity disappear. A building can remain occupied while refinancing becomes more expensive or less available.
I would ask how affiliate fees behave in a weak year. Are they based on revenue, invested capital, transaction volume, or profit? Which continue if distributions stop? Do fees on related services replace outside costs or add another layer? The documents should answer without requiring the investor to guess.
For this business model, I would want the review to link the real estate transaction to the tenant's ongoing business. The core file would include:
I would then ask for a weaker-case plan. What happens if the tenant misses payments, leaves early, or asks for rent relief? How long could the property carry its costs without rent? Who has authority to act, and which actions are allowed within the trust's structure?
Your personal fit comes last in that sequence, but it is not a minor step. A well-documented investment may still be wrong if you need access to the money soon or cannot absorb an income interruption. The purpose of the review is to understand the tradeoffs before you commit, not to make the longest possible list of reasons to buy.
The company announced the platform in January 2026 through Secure Real Estate Exchange. That date should be distinguished from the wider business's prior activity. A later announcement that a DST was fully subscribed describes fundraising, not a final investor return. [3] [4]
No. It is a company name. The security, if any, and the obligations of each party come from the contracts. Property value, tenant payment, financing, and liquidity risks need their own review.
Review both the property and the tenant's finances after the transaction. The seller receives cash but takes on rent obligations. The use of the sale proceeds, other debts, lease terms, and possible replacement tenants all affect the owner's position.
Not merely because its name appears on the building. The tenant might be a franchisee or another separate business. Read the lease and any guarantee to identify the legally responsible party and the limits of its obligation.
Do not assume that. Read the actual property schedule and trust documents. A sponsor can operate across many assets while a particular investor owns exposure to only one building, one lease, or one tenant.
No blanket conclusion follows from the platform name. The interest must receive the appropriate tax treatment, and your exchange must meet its own rules. Your tax adviser and qualified intermediary should review the specific documents and transaction. [8] [9]
Educational information, not an offer or a personal tax, legal, or investment recommendation. Examples are hypothetical and omit stated adjustments. Tax treatment depends on your facts and current law. Review your transaction with your CPA, attorney, and qualified intermediary. Real estate investments can lose value and may be illiquid.
Enter your approved email to explore investments, save your shortlist, and keep learning.