Learn
A little clarity for your next decision.
Loading your learning library…
Investor WorkspaceWelcome, there!Log Out
Investor WorkspaceA little clarity for your next decision.
By Jerry Baker
A free DST property list is a starting collection of offerings, usually supplied without a separate charge for the list itself. It is not a complete market survey, a guarantee of availability, or a personalized investment plan. Use it to organize questions and request evidence, then verify the current terms before acting.
Free usually describes access to the list. It does not mean the investments have no fees, that advice comes without compensation, or that all providers review the same offerings. Ask how the publisher is paid and what happens if you invest. Acquisition, financing, management, selling, and other charges may affect the investment even when the list costs nothing.
A provider may earn compensation connected with an offering or work from a limited menu. Those arrangements require context. FINRA's private-placement guidance addresses conflicts, compensation, and limits on product menus under the rules that apply to member recommendations. Disclosure is part of the picture, but it does not by itself satisfy every duty. [1]
A free list can still be useful. It can introduce investment types, show which questions recur, and help you identify candidates for review. The right test is whether the information is clear, current, and supported. The price of a list does not determine the quality of its contents.
Do not confuse access with acceptance. Receiving a PDF, registering for a portal, or being included in an email list does not establish accredited status, suitability, or sponsor approval. Private offerings have their own eligibility and subscription requirements. The information in a list is only one early part of that process. [2]
Start with the publisher's identity and role. Is it a sponsor showing only its own offerings, a broker comparing part of its menu, a third-party directory, or a general education site? Each source can provide useful information, but its scope differs. A list of partners is not automatically a list of the whole market.
Ask which offerings are included and excluded. The list may cover only one property type, one selling network, or sponsors willing to provide data. Some lists may include examples or closed offerings for context. These limits should be visible rather than hidden behind a broad phrase such as all available DSTs.
Check whether the publisher has reviewed the offerings or merely gathered information. A collected record can be accurate without having passed investment due diligence. Words such as screened and approved need definitions. Approved by the publisher is not approval by the SEC, and a securities notice filing is not a finding that the investment is sound. [2]
If a claim matters to your decision, ask where it came from. A sponsor brochure, current offering memorandum, final loan document, and publisher estimate are not the same kind of evidence. Good lists can point you toward the source rather than asking you to trust a compact table without context.
A list is a snapshot. Its date should tell you when the information was assembled or checked, and those are not always the same event. A PDF created today can contain numbers copied from an older sheet. Ask whether the available capacity, minimums, loan information, and cash figures were reconfirmed.
Keep the version you used for a decision. Save the date, source, and relevant documents with your notes. If a new version arrives, compare material changes rather than simply replacing the old file. A change in status or loan terms may matter more than an updated design or a new photo.
Do not assume a missing offering has been rejected or sold. It may have been removed for many reasons, including a change in the list's scope. Likewise, a new entry may be newly added to the list rather than newly created. Ask for the specific explanation before making an inference about demand or quality.
Before funding, confirm facts through the current offering process. A list cannot hold a place for you unless a separate arrangement actually does so. The available amount may change while you are reading. Treat urgency as a reason to coordinate promptly, not as evidence that a purchase should be rushed.
A one-page inventory helps sort candidates. A sponsor overview describes the firm. A summary or brochure explains an offering in shorter form. The private placement memorandum, trust agreement, subscription papers, financial information, and supplements carry far more detail. Each serves a different purpose.
The SEC warns that private placements may provide limited information and involve illiquidity and total-loss risk. They do not become simple because a list fits them into six columns. Ask for the relevant materials and time to understand them. A brief summary should point toward fuller review, not replace it. [2]
For an exchange-oriented DST, review the trust's actual structure and powers. Revenue Ruling 2004-86 describes a restricted arrangement that receives particular federal tax treatment. A list's DST label is not a personal tax opinion or proof that every investment with that name qualifies. [3]
Also distinguish legal documents from tax illustrations. A sample depreciation or cash-flow schedule may rest on assumed basis, investor facts, or future operations. An exchanger's carried basis can differ from a cash investor's basis. Ask your CPA which parts of an illustration apply to you. [4]
Before comparing numbers, make a small worksheet with consistent headings. Record the exact offering name, sponsor, source date, current status, minimum equity, debt amount, LTV definition, cash-flow definition, property locations, and exit terms. Add a column for unknowns. This extra step can expose differences a polished list hides.
Preserve the original labels as well as your comparison terms. If one entry says annual distribution target and another says current annualized rate, do not rename both guaranteed yield. They may measure different facts. Keep estimates separate from actual payments and ask how each rate was calculated.
Use the same care with debt. One ratio may use an appraised property value while another uses an investor-level acquisition amount. If you cannot reconcile the bases, mark the ratios as not yet comparable. A lower percentage based on a larger denominator does not necessarily mean less debt risk.
For missing data, write not provided. Do not enter zero for an unknown minimum, LTV, or distribution. Zero is a fact with meaning. Unknown is a question. A spreadsheet that treats all blanks as zero can silently create an all-cash offering or a nonexistent minimum that the documents never support.
Suppose two hypothetical entries show 5.2% and 4.8% annual cash rates on equity. On $100,000, the difference is $400 a year. That calculation can be useful, but it is only one piece of a decision. It does not compare fees, risks, reserves, debt, capital returned at exit, or personal taxes.
The higher number may rest on different assumptions. It might cover a different period, use reserves, omit a cost included in the other budget, or involve greater property risk. It could also be supported by a sound plan. The number alone cannot tell you which explanation is correct.
Ask whether cash comes from property operations or another source. A distribution can return part of invested capital. Payments do not automatically equal profit or taxable income. At exit, a loss of capital can offset years of distributions. Review the full cash path instead of treating the first year's rate as total return.
FINRA's communication standards call for fair, balanced comparisons and attention to material differences such as cost, liquidity, risk, and tax features in member communications. A sorted list does not meet the reader's decision needs if those differences vanish behind a percentage. [5]
Write down your net exchange equity, debt paid off, relevant value target, and deadlines before selecting entries. Have your advisers review the actual closing items. Mortgage payoff and adjusted tax basis answer different questions: one helps determine equity, while the other helps determine gain. A list rarely contains the seller's facts needed for either calculation. [4]
In a simplified example, assume you have $600,000 of exchange equity and need another $400,000 of replacement value through properly attributed debt or added cash. The working value target is $1 million. Two $300,000 equity subscriptions may use the cash, but you still need to check their combined debt and value. Equal cash allocation is not the entire exchange test.
If both hypothetical interests are all cash, they provide $600,000 of replacement value under that assumption. Additional outside cash might address the remaining value, but you should not assume the plan fully defers gain without a tax calculation. New debt can substitute for some outside cash; it does not generally erase cash you take out. [4] [6]
Minimums and capacity matter as well. An entry with a $100,000 minimum does not promise room for a $300,000 subscription. A sponsor may need to accept the amount and investor. Confirm both constraints before treating a line on the list as an available piece of your exchange.
One of the most important distinctions is between research and identification. A free list may contain many candidates. Your exchange identification has its own writing, signature, recipient, description, timing, count, and value rules. Saving a list or forwarding it casually does not automatically satisfy those rules. [7]
The identification period generally ends 45 days after the sale transfer. Replacement property generally must be received by the earlier of day 180 or the relevant return due date, including extensions. Those periods run together. A list publisher cannot extend them by keeping a preferred offering on a page. [7]
Work with the QI and tax adviser on exact DST identification language and the underlying properties. Do not assume one portfolio trust always counts as one property for every identification rule. Review the three-property rule, 200% rule, or narrow 95% exception as relevant to your actual list.
Keep sensible alternatives, but only within a valid plan. An offering that appears after day 45 may not be a usable substitute if it was not properly identified. The goal is a set of researched, correctly identified choices, not a late scramble through a larger list.
A free list may require a name, email, phone number, or brief investor questionnaire. Before submitting, read the site's privacy information and any consent language. Ask how your details will be used and whether you are requesting a call, ongoing email, or only the materials. Do not assume every registration works the same way.
Provide accurate information, but use the appropriate secure process for sensitive financial documents. A request for a general list is different from a formal investor verification or subscription review. If someone asks for extensive records, ask what step requires them and who will receive them.
Receiving a list does not require you to invest or agree with a recommendation. It is reasonable to ask questions, decline follow-up, or conclude that the available choices do not fit. A helpful discussion should make the investment easier to understand, including its drawbacks, rather than make you feel committed because you downloaded a file.
Be careful when forwarding private materials. The offering's distribution terms and securities exemption may limit how it is promoted or shared. Ask the provider how to introduce another interested person instead of assuming every document can be posted publicly. Access rules and investment merit remain separate issues. [2]
First, can you tell when its facts were checked? Second, does it explain its scope? Third, are projected and actual figures distinct? Fourth, does it identify costs, risks, and missing information? Fifth, can it lead you to current source documents? These are practical quality tests, not a guarantee that a list has undergone a professional audit.
Look for language that exceeds the evidence. Guaranteed, risk free, tax free, and best require careful scrutiny in investment materials. A 1031 exchange generally defers qualifying gain; it does not make every cash payment or future sale tax free. An IRS ruling about structure does not endorse the real estate or forecast. [3] [4]
Also watch for pressure that discourages questions. FINRA warns about offering schedules that do not allow sufficient reasonable investigation. A time-sensitive exchange needs prompt coordination, but it still needs evidence. If a key claim cannot be verified, the correct outcome may be to leave the offering off your shortlist. [1]
Do not confuse a long list with a good decision process. More options can help research, but they also increase the work of comparing unlike figures. A smaller set with clear evidence and open questions may be more useful than hundreds of entries whose status and terms are uncertain.
If you collect several free lists, the same offering may appear on more than one. Suppose one list has 12 entries and another has 18. If eight are the same offerings, the combined set has 22 distinct entries, not 30. That simple count assumes the matches are correct and all other entries are distinct.
Match the exact issuer and offering, not just the property photo or a shortened title. Two similarly named trusts may hold different assets. One portfolio may be marketed with different descriptions. A later series may have different terms from an earlier one. Keep the original names and source documents so the comparison does not merge investments that are actually separate.
When a true duplicate has different figures, preserve both versions until you resolve the conflict. Record the source date, document edition, field definition, and explanation. One provider may show initial targeted cash while another shows a later rate. One may have updated capacity while the other has not. The point is to establish the supported current fact, not to choose the more attractive number.
Also keep source limits visible after merging. Combining two selected lists does not turn them into a complete market survey. If both draw from the same group of sponsors, the combined set may add little new reach. It can still be useful, provided you describe it as the offerings collected from those sources.
A cleaned research file should therefore show one record per confirmed offering, with its original sources attached. That makes questions easier to answer and reduces the chance that the same exposure is counted twice in a draft portfolio.
Choose a manageable group to discuss, then write why each one deserves attention. State how it might fit your income, exchange, and time needs. Beside that, state the biggest question or reason it may not fit. This keeps the conversation balanced from the start.
Bring your comparison sheet and current documents to the review. Ask the professional to explain the sponsor, real estate, business plan, risks, and costs. FINRA's guidance describes a fact-specific reasonable investigation and an investor-specific recommendation process. A list is useful preparation for those conversations, not a replacement for them. [1]
Record what changed after the review. You may remove a candidate because its debt is too high, because its cash is too uncertain, or because its exit limits do not fit your plans. You may keep another but require answers before proceeding. A clear not-yet decision is better than treating every saved row as a likely purchase.
Before signing or funding, return to the current offering terms and exchange plan. Reconfirm capacity, acceptance, identification, timing, and the final dollar amounts. That is how a free list becomes useful: it starts a documented process that eventually relies on far more than the list.
The list may be provided without a separate charge, but that says nothing about investment fees or how the provider is paid. Ask about compensation, product-menu limits, and costs if you invest. Free access is not the same as a fee-free investment.
Do not assume so. It may cover selected sponsors, one network, one property type, or only records the publisher has collected. Ask for the scope and as-of date. A broad title is not evidence that the list covers the entire market.
A summary is not enough to understand the full offering. Review current documents, risks, costs, sponsor information, and your own needs with the appropriate professionals. Private placements may be illiquid and can lose the full investment. A short table cannot remove those risks. [2]
No. It may measure a different period, use different assumptions, or involve greater risk. Compare cash sources, costs, debt, reserves, and possible exit proceeds. A higher initial payment can be offset by lower later payments or lost capital.
No. Identification has specific signed-writing, delivery, description, timing, and count or value requirements. Coordinate the actual identification with your QI and advisers. A research list and a compliant identification serve different purposes. [7]
Use them as starting facts to verify. Terms and available capacity may change, and the sponsor must accept a subscription. A minimum does not reserve the amount you want. Check the current documents and responsible parties before making the allocation final.
No. Portal or list access is separate from any investor-status review, customer-specific recommendation, and sponsor acceptance. The actual securities exemption and offering requirements govern who may invest. Giving an email address does not complete those steps. [2]
Compare dates, definitions, and original sources. Ask whether one uses a projection and the other actual cash, or whether terms changed. Mark the difference unresolved until you receive a supported explanation. Do not average conflicting figures and treat the result as a fact.
Educational information, not an offer or a personal tax, legal, or investment recommendation. Examples are hypothetical and omit stated adjustments. Tax treatment depends on your facts and current law. Review your transaction with your CPA, attorney, and qualified intermediary. Real estate investments can lose value and may be illiquid.
Enter your approved email to explore investments, save your shortlist, and keep learning.